Interpreting Ensemble Results
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: June 14th, 2021, 10:46 am
- Registered HYSPLIT User: Yes
Interpreting Ensemble Results
I ran a forward trajectory ensemble at a starting height of 200 m AGL with HRRR from this morning. Here are the results. Is the divergence seen an indication that a single trajectory might not give reliable results this morning?
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: September 18th, 2017, 2:20 pm
- Registered HYSPLIT User: No
Re: Interpreting Ensemble Results
Yes, I agree. Because of the stochastic feature of atmospheric flow, it is always better to have multiple trajectory runs instead of only relying on a single trajectory.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: June 14th, 2021, 10:46 am
- Registered HYSPLIT User: Yes
Re: Interpreting Ensemble Results
I ran a trajectory at 3 heights, 10 m, 100 m, and 200m (see attached), using the met file 20210617_06-11_hrrr, the same met file used in the ensemble trajectory above. My question now is, what does the ensemble say about the trajectories I just ran? Are they ok or of questionable accuracy?
Re: Interpreting Ensemble Results
Were you using the meteorological ensemble option in which it moves the meteorology around by 1 grid cell?
https://www.ready.noaa.gov/documents/Tu ... ensem.html
"Another multiple trajectory approach, an extension of a previous section on sources of trajectory error, is a variation of an old manual technique, where trajectories are started about the point of interest, and the divergence of those trajectories would provide a more quantitative estimate of the uncertainty associated with the center point trajectory. In HYSPLIT, this method has been incorporated directly into the code so that trajectories are automatically computed about a 3-dimensional cube centered about the starting point. However, the initial positions are not offset, just the meteorological data point associated with each particular trajectory, so that all trajectories start from the same point."
The spread in the trajectories gives you some idea of the uncertainty in the trajectory. If that uncertainty is larger than the accuracy you
want, then you probably want to be more careful and do some further investigation.
For instance you could run with other met data sets or see if there are any wind direction measurements to compare to.
https://www.ready.noaa.gov/documents/Tu ... ensem.html
"Another multiple trajectory approach, an extension of a previous section on sources of trajectory error, is a variation of an old manual technique, where trajectories are started about the point of interest, and the divergence of those trajectories would provide a more quantitative estimate of the uncertainty associated with the center point trajectory. In HYSPLIT, this method has been incorporated directly into the code so that trajectories are automatically computed about a 3-dimensional cube centered about the starting point. However, the initial positions are not offset, just the meteorological data point associated with each particular trajectory, so that all trajectories start from the same point."
The spread in the trajectories gives you some idea of the uncertainty in the trajectory. If that uncertainty is larger than the accuracy you
want, then you probably want to be more careful and do some further investigation.
For instance you could run with other met data sets or see if there are any wind direction measurements to compare to.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: June 14th, 2021, 10:46 am
- Registered HYSPLIT User: Yes
Re: Interpreting Ensemble Results
I used the online HYSPLIT, so whatever the default is. I assume 1 grid cell but it is not defined in the online version.
Re: Interpreting Ensemble Results
Yes -it is always 1 grid cell.