Trouble With TrajStat Example
Posted: May 13th, 2019, 10:20 am
Hello everyone,
I am having trouble replicating the clustering and PSCF calculations in the TrajStat example.
For the clustering part, I can create a .txt file and TSV plot which looks similar to the example. However, when I plot the clusters using the "mean traj" button, I find similar clusters but not exactly the same (see attached). Particularly, cluster 2 (cluster 5 in the example) does not extend as far north and cluster 3 (cluster 1 in the example) extends too far west. When I "add to traj" and view the attribute data table, I see some correct cluster numbers/patterns in the cluster row, but several incorrect rows.
I believe this issue extends into the PSCF calculations. While I can create a layer matching the example, there is no "save as" dialog box. Again, when I do the calculation and weight it, I have too many regions with PSCF >0.7 (see attached).
I am worried about this because when I do these calculations with my research I similarly find many reginos with PSCF > 1.0, which does not make sense. Any insight into what may be happening or what user error may be occuring is greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your help!
I am having trouble replicating the clustering and PSCF calculations in the TrajStat example.
For the clustering part, I can create a .txt file and TSV plot which looks similar to the example. However, when I plot the clusters using the "mean traj" button, I find similar clusters but not exactly the same (see attached). Particularly, cluster 2 (cluster 5 in the example) does not extend as far north and cluster 3 (cluster 1 in the example) extends too far west. When I "add to traj" and view the attribute data table, I see some correct cluster numbers/patterns in the cluster row, but several incorrect rows.
I believe this issue extends into the PSCF calculations. While I can create a layer matching the example, there is no "save as" dialog box. Again, when I do the calculation and weight it, I have too many regions with PSCF >0.7 (see attached).
I am worried about this because when I do these calculations with my research I similarly find many reginos with PSCF > 1.0, which does not make sense. Any insight into what may be happening or what user error may be occuring is greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your help!