Dear HYSPLIT,
I did simulations using GFS data to compare depositions with ocean surface transport being switched on and off (see the attached, left is off, right is on). The 2- to 3-order differences seemed quite significant. Could you provide some insight into this?
Thank you.
Sun
several orders larger in depositions when ocean surface transport is enabled
Re: several orders larger in depositions when ocean surface transport is enabled
Interesting. This is probably because the computational particles deposited on the water surface are not undergoing dispersion, only advection by the mean winds. With no dispersion, dilution of the material will be much less.
https://www.ready.noaa.gov/hysplitusers ... #sfc_water
Transport of Particles Deposited on Water Surfaces
The main code was modified (October 2003 Version 4.6) to permit particles deposited on water surfaces to continue to be transported on the water surface by the wind generated drift current. The transport output is treated as a deposition surface for display purposes. This new deposition method then creates particles that can be transported on water surfaces. Particles can be deposited on any surface. However, if the surface is defined as water, then the particle is assigned a unique identification code to distinguish it from atmospheric particles or puffs. These new particles may continue to be transported along the surface of the water contributing to deposition each time step but not air concentration. Dispersion is not computed for these particles. When they approach a land surface they are deleted. The water surface transport option is invoked from the namelist file with ICHEM=7. This option automatically forces the probability deposition computation (ICHEM=5) and should only be used only with the 3D particle mode (IN ITD=0). Surface water deposition can only be displayed if the deposition output level (0) is defined. Although particles may deposit over land, over-land deposition values are never shown.
The wind induced surface water drift current is assumed to equal the vector atmospheric friction velocity. The friction velocity represents the momentum transport to the surface and it is an approximation of the surface water movement. Currently only the GFS meteorological model output file contains the vector momentum flux components.
https://www.ready.noaa.gov/hysplitusers ... #sfc_water
Transport of Particles Deposited on Water Surfaces
The main code was modified (October 2003 Version 4.6) to permit particles deposited on water surfaces to continue to be transported on the water surface by the wind generated drift current. The transport output is treated as a deposition surface for display purposes. This new deposition method then creates particles that can be transported on water surfaces. Particles can be deposited on any surface. However, if the surface is defined as water, then the particle is assigned a unique identification code to distinguish it from atmospheric particles or puffs. These new particles may continue to be transported along the surface of the water contributing to deposition each time step but not air concentration. Dispersion is not computed for these particles. When they approach a land surface they are deleted. The water surface transport option is invoked from the namelist file with ICHEM=7. This option automatically forces the probability deposition computation (ICHEM=5) and should only be used only with the 3D particle mode (IN ITD=0). Surface water deposition can only be displayed if the deposition output level (0) is defined. Although particles may deposit over land, over-land deposition values are never shown.
The wind induced surface water drift current is assumed to equal the vector atmospheric friction velocity. The friction velocity represents the momentum transport to the surface and it is an approximation of the surface water movement. Currently only the GFS meteorological model output file contains the vector momentum flux components.
Re: several orders larger in depositions when ocean surface transport is enabled
Dear Alice,
Thank you for the detailed info.
x.sun
Thank you for the detailed info.
x.sun