Grid concentrations not what I expect

Post questions, comments and links to research (research papers, web sites, etc) involving HYSPLIT and wildfire smoke. This section is also to facilitate collaborations between researchers involved in smoke transport and dispersion.
Post Reply
dmbakker
Posts: 9
Joined: August 4th, 2021, 1:18 pm
Registered HYSPLIT User: Yes

Grid concentrations not what I expect

Post by dmbakker »

I'm simulating four fires emitting 15000 g/hr PM2.5 per hour, for 24 hours, starting 2024 30 00, and the particle plot (PARTPLOT) shows what I would expect. Particles being emitted for 24 hours, dispersing and then ceasing to emit after 24 hours. The grid concentrations however, seem to show emissions for a couple hours at height of 1m, then almost nothing (as shown by the grid concentrations around the emission points after 4-5 hours at a height of 1m), then a slight increase in concentration about 18 hours after emission started. The graph (Picture 3) enclosed are the average concentrations for 5 different heights across the whole area where grid concentrations have been detected at 5 different levels. The weather is nothing special. The PBLH and the surface temp (TMPS, see graph) however vary significantly during the day, the wind is a little breeze. I can't explain the lack of concentrations around these emission points while the particles tell a different story. Can someone shed some light on this for me please?
Attachments
Graphs
Graphs
PARTPLOT snapshot
PARTPLOT snapshot
GRIDPLOT snapshot
GRIDPLOT snapshot
Tianfeng.Chai
Posts: 25
Joined: September 18th, 2017, 2:20 pm
Registered HYSPLIT User: No

Re: Grid concentrations not what I expect

Post by Tianfeng.Chai »

Can you please post your CONTROL and SETUP files ?
dmbakker
Posts: 9
Joined: August 4th, 2021, 1:18 pm
Registered HYSPLIT User: Yes

Re: Grid concentrations not what I expect

Post by dmbakker »

A small update in this area. I realised that the various particle parameters were set too low for what I was trying to, and emissions were aborted prematurely. By greatly increasing the number of particles emitted in one cycle the emission reflected what I thought they should be. Emissions happened for the entire duration as set, it slowed down the calculations but the output was much improved.
Post Reply

Return to “Wildfire Smoke”