Thanks Alice
That makes a lot of sense. The scales have fallen from my eyes!
Dean
Search found 3 matches
- February 7th, 2019, 6:28 pm
- Forum: Users
- Topic: NUMPAR v emission rate
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11992
- January 30th, 2019, 10:06 pm
- Forum: Users
- Topic: NUMPAR v emission rate
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11992
Re: NUMPAR v emission rate
Thanks ariel.stein
My work is focusing on particle simulations not puff and much of what you said about NUMPAR makes sense, but what i don't understand is that emission rate, which is generated in the CONTROL file and is defined as number of particles per hour, appears to be similar to NUMPAR ...
My work is focusing on particle simulations not puff and much of what you said about NUMPAR makes sense, but what i don't understand is that emission rate, which is generated in the CONTROL file and is defined as number of particles per hour, appears to be similar to NUMPAR ...
- January 29th, 2019, 9:16 pm
- Forum: Users
- Topic: NUMPAR v emission rate
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11992
NUMPAR v emission rate
Hi all
I am trying to figure out how NUMPAR and emission rate interact. NUMPAR is the number of particles to be released per cycle, while emission rate is the "mass units released each hour".
1. How long is a cycle? Can this be adjusted by the user?
2. Is emission rate the number of units ...
I am trying to figure out how NUMPAR and emission rate interact. NUMPAR is the number of particles to be released per cycle, while emission rate is the "mass units released each hour".
1. How long is a cycle? Can this be adjusted by the user?
2. Is emission rate the number of units ...